2000 Panoz AIV vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2000 Panoz AIV is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Panoz AIV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Panoz AIV | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Panoz | Plymouth |
| Model | AIV | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
