2000 Panoz AIV vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Panoz AIV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Panoz AIV would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Panoz AIV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Panoz AIV weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Panoz AIV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Panoz AIV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Panoz AIV (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2000 Panoz AIV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2005 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2000 Panoz AIV has manual transmission. 2000 Panoz AIV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Panoz AIV | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Panoz | Renault |
Model | AIV | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 70 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |