2000 Peugeot 206 vs. 1968 Renault 8
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 206 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,122 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Renault 8.
Because 1968 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Peugeot 206 | 1968 Renault 8 | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 206 | 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1122 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 40 L |