2000 Peugeot 206 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 206 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 206 (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 94 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Peugeot 206 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | 206 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1122 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
