2000 Peugeot 504 vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Peugeot 504. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Peugeot 504 would be higher. At 2,519 cc, 2008 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C30 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2000 Peugeot 504. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2000 Peugeot 504. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C30 weights approximately 177 kg more than 2000 Peugeot 504. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Peugeot 504 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Peugeot 504. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Peugeot 504 | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | 504 | C30 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2519 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
