2000 Peugeot Kart Up vs. 1996 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1996 Volvo S40. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo S40.
Because 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Peugeot Kart Up. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (289 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo S40. (177 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot Kart Up will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Peugeot Kart Up | 1996 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | Kart Up | S40 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 2945 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 289 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3290 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1400 mm |
