2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo vs. 1958 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Simca Aronde is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | 1958 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Simca |
| Model | Metrocubo | Aronde |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 505 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
