2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo vs. 1990 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo has automatic transmission and 1990 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1990 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | 1990 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Pininfarina | Volvo |
Model | Metrocubo | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 505 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |