2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo has automatic transmission and 2012 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2012 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Pininfarina | Cadillac |
Model | Metrocubo | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 505 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |