2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Pininfarina | Holden |
Model | Metrocubo | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 505 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |