2000 Plymouth Neon vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Neon would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Plymouth Neon | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
Model | Neon | Leaf |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |