2000 Plymouth Prowler vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 745 kg more than 1963 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 570 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Plymouth Prowler | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Seat |
| Model | Prowler | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
| Torque | 610 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
