2000 Plymouth Prowler vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 205 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Plymouth Prowler | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Chrysler |
| Model | Prowler | 160 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3507 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 610 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
