2000 Plymouth Prowler vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Prowler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Prowler would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1291 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford E-150. (387 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Plymouth Prowler | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Prowler | E-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 610 Nm | 387 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3505 mm |