2000 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville (204 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 420 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Pontiac Bonneville | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
| Model | Bonneville | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3783 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |
