2000 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 998 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pontiac Bonneville (311 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 2000 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Pontiac Bonneville | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Pontiac | Renault |
| Model | Bonneville | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3783 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |
