2000 Pontiac Montana vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1122 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano. 2000 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2012 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2012 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Pontiac Montana | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Pontiac | Tata |
Model | Montana | Nano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 73.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 37 L |