2000 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2011 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 207 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 207 (152 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 2000 Pontiac Trans Am.
Because 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Pontiac Trans Am | 2011 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Pontiac | Peugeot |
Model | Trans Am | 207 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 152 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1972 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1397 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |