2000 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am weights approximately 177 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Pontiac Trans Am | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Pontiac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Trans Am | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2550 mm |
