2000 Proton 300 vs. 2006 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sienna is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,308 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Sienna (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Sienna (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300. 2006 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 2000 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 2000 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Proton 300 | 2006 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Proton | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Sienna |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3308 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3040 mm |