2000 Proton 300 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 300 (75 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Proton 300 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Proton | Ford |
Model | 300 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |