2000 Proton 400 vs. 1962 Volvo 120

To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 400 (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volvo 120 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Proton 400.

Because 1962 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 120 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Proton 400 1962 Volvo 120
Make Proton Volvo
Model 400 120
Year Released 2000 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 1778 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 67 HP
Torque 108 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1010 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2610 mm