2000 Proton 400 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. Both 2000 Proton 400 and 1983 Zastava 102 are equipped with a 1,299 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Proton 400 (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Proton 400 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Proton | Zastava |
| Model | 400 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2160 mm |
