2000 Proton 400 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Proton 400 (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Proton 400 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 400 | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1148 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2400 mm |