2000 Proton 400 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 66 kg more than 2000 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Proton 400 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Proton | Volkswagen |
Model | 400 | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2470 mm |