2000 Renault Clio vs. 1989 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 665 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1989 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Clio | 1989 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |