2000 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 530 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Clio | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |