2000 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1131 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Clio | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 2066 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |