2000 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Kia Borrego
To start off, 2011 Kia Borrego is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Borrego weights approximately 355 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2011 Kia Borrego is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Kia Borrego. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Clio | 2011 Kia Borrego | |
Make | Renault | Kia |
Model | Clio | Borrego |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 78 L |