2000 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Renault Clio | 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Clio | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4666 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 63 L |
