2000 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2013 Subaru Outback is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Outback weights approximately 621 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2013 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Renault Clio | 2013 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | Clio | Outback |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
