2000 Renault Laguna vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Renault Laguna is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Laguna (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Laguna weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault Laguna. (153 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Laguna | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Laguna | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |