2000 Renault Laguna vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Laguna would be higher. At 2,944 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Laguna (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 2009 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Laguna weights approximately 180 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Laguna (289 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Laguna | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Laguna | Matrix |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2944 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |