2000 Renault Laguna vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Laguna would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Renault Laguna.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Laguna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault Laguna. (289 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault Laguna | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Renault | Lamborghini |
Model | Laguna | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4345 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1184 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.1 L/100km | 20.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |