2000 Renault P55 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault P55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault P55 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 396 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault P55 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | P55 | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1374 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |