2000 Renault P55 vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault P55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault P55 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 74 kg more than 2010 Jaguar XK.
Because 2010 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XK (515 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Renault P55. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Renault P55.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault P55 | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | P55 | XK |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |