2000 Renault P55 vs. 2011 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2011 Mercury Mariner is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault P55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault P55 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercury Mariner (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2011 Mercury Mariner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mercury Mariner. (232 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Renault P55 | 2011 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Renault | Mercury |
Model | P55 | Mariner |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 62 L |