2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
| Model | Park Ward | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 5379 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3260 mm |
