2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Simca |
Model | Park Ward | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 499 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2450 mm |