2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1977 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 1977 Subaru 1400 has manual transmission. 1977 Subaru 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1977 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Subaru |
Model | Park Ward | 1400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |