2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mazda |
Model | Park Ward | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2520 mm |