2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
| Model | Park Ward | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5379 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 499 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2550 mm |
