2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
| Model | Park Ward | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2550 mm |
