2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Rover |
Model | Park Ward | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 499 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2510 mm |