2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1250 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Park Ward | Opa |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |