2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 287 kg more than 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Silver Seraph | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5379 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 2591 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 6050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 104 L |
