2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph weights approximately 196 kg more than 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Silver Seraph | Silver Cloud II |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5379 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 318 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 81 L |
