2000 Rover 75 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 2000 Rover 75 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rover 75 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rover 75 (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rover 75 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Rover | Volvo |
| Model | 75 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
