2000 Rover 75 vs. 1994 TVR Type S
To start off, 2000 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 TVR Type S would be higher. At 2,931 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 TVR Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rover 75 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1994 TVR Type S.
Because 1994 TVR Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 TVR Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Rover 75 | 1994 TVR Type S | |
| Make | Rover | TVR |
| Model | 75 | Type S |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2931 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2300 mm |
