2000 Saturn L vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn L (135 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 Saturn L.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Saturn L | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Saturn | Talbot |
| Model | L | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3130 mm |
